🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic negotiations with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared recent overtures had come from intermediaries to restart discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran does not want be seen to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that ended with the US president declaring the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, EU nations employed their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in various formats if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his address to the forum, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust difficult to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to impose their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the final answer to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the state in the face of this assault."